Source: http://feeds.celebritybabies.com/~r/celebrity-babies/~3/FS2MEG6zg1E/
FSU Cowgirls Gabrielle Union Garcelle Beauvais Genelle Frenoy Georgianna Robertson
Minneapolis attorney William Butler has been suspended from practicing law in the federal appellate court of the 8th Circuit and the federal court for Minnesota.
Last summer, Chief Judge Michael Davis asked retired Judge James Rosenbaum to investigate Butler’s fitness to appear before this court and to make a disciplinary recommendation. Butler has been hit with more than $300,000 in sanctions by the federal judges in Minnesota.
He defends people whose homes have been foreclosed on. He routinely argues that that mortgage companies do not have clear title to the original notes, therefore the foreclosure is illegal. That argument has been repeatedly rejected in court.
In an order, the court said he uses delay tactics and shops for judges by dismissing lawsuits and them immediately refiling them. In one instance he shuffled the plaintiffs and refiled the same suit with a different lead plaintiff. The court estimated he has filed more than 30 frivolous lawsuits and to date has not paid any of what he owes.
The Appeals Court said he will remain suspended until he pays the sanctions to the Minnesota federal court or the court finds he has “substantially complied with his obligations to it.” Davis said he will not lift his suspension until the Appeals Court reinstates Butler.
Source: http://minnlawyer.com/minnlawyerblog/2014/01/16/attorney-william-butler-suspended/
bankruptcy lawyers best attorney business law business lawyer civil attorney
Go see Captain America this weekend! Support our Colin!
I went to the premiere on Tuesday and it was the coolest thing ever. First, the movie is AMAZING and Chris Evans is a superstar. Second, there were so many damn people there it was insane. I have been to movie premieres in New York before and they were nothing like this. I mean, they closed down Hollywood Boulevard. I would've taken photos to show you, but the invite said to leave phones in the car. But here's a photo of me in my cool Captain America 3D glasses:
(Sit down, stop jumping around, it's an awesome picture, I know. And the quality is amazing. It's not grainy or reddish... it's perfect.) (No, it's not.)
(And you can totally see the Captain America logo on the side of the glasses.) (No, you can't.)
Anyway, Captain America is pulling a strong 71% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes right now so GO SEE IT! IT'S FANTASTIC!
Source: http://www.prettyinthecity.com/blog/2011/7/22/captain-america.html
Beyoncé Bianca Kajlich Bijou Phillips Blake Lively Blu Cantrell
Ed continues his discussion of the issues involved in selling a law practice.
Source: http://feeds.lexblog.com/~r/LawBizBlog/~3/urgwN0OoUaM/
estate attorney family law family lawyer federal attorney financial lawyer
personal injury attorneys personal injury lawyer personal injury lawyers power attorney power of attorney
Mariah Carey’s new album is ‘Me. I Am Mariah… The Elusive Chanteuse’ and, as fans know all too well it is her first new album in five years. Long awaited, yes, and now the music critics are weighing in. Find out what they have to say.
‘Me. I Am Mariah… The Elusive Chanteuse’ is her fourteenth album and it is the first since the 2009 release, ‘Memoirs of an Imperfect Angel.’ While that is a few years, it’s not quite so long that we must give it the obligatory “comeback” appellation, but yet in many ways it is a comeback.
While Mariah Carey has never disappeared from headlines, she has been more of an inhabitant of the celebrity realm, with the birth of twins, and with it the typical fanfare that ensures as celebrity watchers begin to scrutinized the baby bump, the baby pictures and, of course, the post-baby body debut.
But with one album Mariah Carey has reminded everyone of why she is above all a pop music diva, and deservedly so. Needing no gimmicks, just an incredible voice of immense range, expression and power. Critics are giving her mostly positive reviews, indeed, quite a few rave reviews.
Here’s a roundup.
“….Working with longtime collaborator Jermaine Dupri, Carey front-loads the track list with midtempo R&B and soulful torch songs that spotlight her best asset: That Voice….” — Entertainment Weekly
“….Whether in more elegant ballads, or most assertive R&B songs, the new tunes give Carey more to play with than usual. It’s as if she’d been listening to Beyonce’s albums, gaining tips for how to bridge trendy music with the classic type. Even a hip-hop influenced ditty like “Thirsty” has a broad tune. Contrary to its title, the new album may be Carey’s least elusive work. Rarely has she made her talent more clear. …” — New York Daily News
“….Admittedly, there’s a good deal of clutter: not just 90s R&B throwbacks such as You’re Mine (Eternal) and a gospelised cover of George Michael’s One More Try, but an appearance by her three-year-old twins. Yet she’s also at her most soulful and melodic, and the best of the bunch, such as the dreamy 70s disco of Meteorite, make this album a welcome return….” — The Guardian
“….The usual, more or less. Musically, it’s her typical mix of pop-classicist balladry and hip-hop-tinged summer jamming, and if Carey doesn’t exactly go strutting into new territory, it’s because she knows most people like her right where she is….” — Billboard
“…Me. I Am Mariah… The Elusive Chanteuse” finds Carey revisiting days gone by, both in terms of musical styles and collaborators like Jermaine Dupri, Bryan-Michael Cox and Rodney Jerkins. The result is a refreshing rebound from 2009′s so-so “Memoirs of an Imperfect Angle.”….” — The Cleveland Plain Dealer
“….Me. I Am Mariah…The Elusive Chanteuse (which should count as a self-titled album) finds her owning her multiple personalities, minus the caricature. It’s a successful merger of her opposing images: the forever-young R&B star known to skate at a theme park in daisy dukes and the balladeer who finger-wags behind a mic in a gown. …” — VIBE
“….So what’s most striking about Carey’s new album — titled, rather insistently, Me. I Am Mariah …The Elusive Chanteuse…is how relaxed and confident she sounds. Gone is the self-consciousness that marred her last studio album, 2009′s Memoirs of an Imperfect Angel. Instead, Carey — whose delays of Chanteuse’s release date inspired predictable hand-wringing (as did the less-than-spectacular performance of the lead singles) — gives the impression that her only concerns are meeting her own standards, and those of the fans who have stuck with her through everything. …” — USA Today
While Beyonce was a game changer in surprising the entire world — including music industry insiders — with a surprise album, Mariah Carey, on the other hand, has delivered a surprise all her own for the skeptics and the detracters, in meeting if not exceeding expectations and hopes.
Pictures: PR Photos
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RightCelebrity/~3/gfUK8VNdGkk/
There was a screening in New York last night hosted by Marie Claire magazine. Here I am:
Milly Jacket, Theory blouse, J Brand jeans, Chloe shoes, Kate Spade earrings, and the handbag was a gift from my friend Caprice!
Source: http://www.prettyinthecity.com/blog/2011/9/28/nyc-screening-with-marie-claire.html
Brooke Burke Brooke Burns Busy Philipps Cameron Diaz Cameron Richardson
Aside: For those unaware, a "knock and talk" is a means of circumventing the warrant requirement by relying on submission to the shield, lies, fear and the possibility that the agents might either see or cause something to happen to give rise to an exception to the warrant requirement that would allow them to enter a home. And yes, it's been held to be perfectly lawful since anyone, cop or Fuller Brush salesman, can knock on your door and say "hi." Or scream "police", as the case may be.According to the testimony, Stephens heard "scurrying and shuffling" inside the apartment upon her knocking on the door, "which immediately caused us concern." A male voice asked who it was, and after he responded "police," there were "loud movements" and a "short delay" before Mongold opened the door. That's when the bad stuff happened.
After the delay, Mr. Mongold, who had been living in the home for several months, opened the door. Agent Stephens smelled marijuana and recognized what he believed were prison tattoos on Mr. Mongold. Agent Stephens asked for Ms. Moore. Mr. Mongold told him that he would go get her and turned to walk to the back of the house to find her. The officers followed him inside even though they did not have permission to enter the house.
Once inside, they saw ammunition. Knowing that Moore was a prior felon, possession of ammunition was a crime, and it went downhill from there. Mongold, Moore and her two adult children subsequently consented to a search of the place, which found drugs and guns.
The defendant moved to suppress before the district court, based on the initial warrantless entry. The government's argument below was that the smell of marijuana, combined with the "prison tats" on Mongold's arm, suggesting that he too was a felon, created a justifiable fear of officer safety, which allowed for Stephens to enter for a protective sweep. The court below also held the entry justified under exigent circumstances to preserve evidence.
The Circuit wasn't as impressed. While the court acknowledged that the smell of marijuana is accepted as a basis to believe there is pot inside, it merely gives rise to a belief that it's basic possession of marijuana.
But that wasn't the only argument. There remained their deep concern for the safety from the smell (yes, I'm being facetious calling it "second hand smoke," because it's unclear whether the smell is smoke or fresh pot, and the opinion really has nothing to do with the second-hand smoke aspect in any event).Based on the foregoing, if marijuana possession is the only crime for which the officers in this case had probable cause, the exigency exception for destruction of evidence should not apply because marijuana possession is not a serious crime.
Even the use of cool active verbs ("scurrying"), curious descriptors ("loud movements") and expressions of deep concern reflecting both the terrible, life-and-death dangers of conducting a "knock and talk" to circumvent the Constitution, didn't sway the court. Instead, the court reached the conclusion of remarkably wisdom: An idea so radical, so outlandish, that it never occurred to either the agents or the prosecutors: walk away. While this might make for good fodder to be chiseled into the lintels over courthouses everywhere, the bad news is that the opinion, while persuasive, is not precedential: At the suppression hearing, Agent Stephens argued that he feared for his and the other officers' safety because the home's owner, Ms. Moore, was a known felon, and he suspected Mr. Mongold was a felon as well, based on his "prison tattoos."
Officer safety is not an alternative ground to affirm because the first element of the test is dispositive. The Government presented no evidence that the officers had "reasonable grounds to believe that there [was] immediate need to protect their lives or others." Before entering the home, the officers had not seen a weapon or any other indication of heightened danger. They could most easily have protected the officers' safety by leaving Ms. Moore's home, not by entering it.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value.
This, of course, means that the next time a second-hand smoke case arises, the district judge may not be willing to adopt such a radical concept as expecting the agents to walk away rather than conduct a warrantless search of a home after smelling marijuana or seeing prison tats, because they're very scary to agents.
And don't discount the possibility that if the odor was of burning pot, the agents would be authorized to break down the door to protect themselves from the second hand smoke. Truth is, this opinion doesn't preclude such a holding at all. It could still happen.
Source: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2013/07/13/officer-safety-and-second-hand-smoke.aspx?ref=rss
power attorney power of attorney power of attorny private attorney private lawyer
Ariana Grande’s ‘Problem’ music video has debuted. The pop music diva and her Iggy Azalea, her guest artist, take us on a dazzling trip back to the 1960s, with mini-skirts and psychedelic visuals and Big Sean drops in for a cameo appearance.
The 20-year-old Ariana Grande has made the transition from Nickelodeon star to pop music star with a successful debut album, ‘Yours Truly,’ that debuted at No. 1. But with another album already on the way, she’s not finished dominating the charts, as her new song ‘Problem’ produced by Max Martin has already reached No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100. Australian rapper, Iggy Azalea, her guest artist has a hit of her own that’s ruling the charts, as ‘Fancy’ hits No. 2 and may yet top ‘Problem.’ Either way, it seems our songs of the summer have two strong contenders already.
The song is infectious and its hook will linger with you, ‘I got one less, one less problem / One less problem without ya’
Now there’s an exciting music video to go along with it that gleefully takes a headlong dive into the 1960s. It’s engaging, and with a literal blizzard of stripes and other visual effects that some may find trippy.
And yes, the pop diva — in the very best sense with her amazing, multi-octave vocal range — Ariana Grande is decked out in a mini-skirt and Go-Go boots that evoke Nancy Sinatra and the iconic song ‘These Boots Are Made For Walkin” Iggy Azalea, who’s been lately a fashion icon, makes a memorable appearance as well, in full fledged ’60s mode.
One might wonder, why that particular decade, why the costumes and the sexy dancing, but as is so often the case with music videos it’s a matter of “why ask why?!” The video has gone viral and you can see it in its entirety below!
Pictures: PR Photos
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RightCelebrity/~3/eOSy110K2rY/
Aside: For those unaware, a "knock and talk" is a means of circumventing the warrant requirement by relying on submission to the shield, lies, fear and the possibility that the agents might either see or cause something to happen to give rise to an exception to the warrant requirement that would allow them to enter a home. And yes, it's been held to be perfectly lawful since anyone, cop or Fuller Brush salesman, can knock on your door and say "hi." Or scream "police", as the case may be.According to the testimony, Stephens heard "scurrying and shuffling" inside the apartment upon her knocking on the door, "which immediately caused us concern." A male voice asked who it was, and after he responded "police," there were "loud movements" and a "short delay" before Mongold opened the door. That's when the bad stuff happened.
After the delay, Mr. Mongold, who had been living in the home for several months, opened the door. Agent Stephens smelled marijuana and recognized what he believed were prison tattoos on Mr. Mongold. Agent Stephens asked for Ms. Moore. Mr. Mongold told him that he would go get her and turned to walk to the back of the house to find her. The officers followed him inside even though they did not have permission to enter the house.
Once inside, they saw ammunition. Knowing that Moore was a prior felon, possession of ammunition was a crime, and it went downhill from there. Mongold, Moore and her two adult children subsequently consented to a search of the place, which found drugs and guns.
The defendant moved to suppress before the district court, based on the initial warrantless entry. The government's argument below was that the smell of marijuana, combined with the "prison tats" on Mongold's arm, suggesting that he too was a felon, created a justifiable fear of officer safety, which allowed for Stephens to enter for a protective sweep. The court below also held the entry justified under exigent circumstances to preserve evidence.
The Circuit wasn't as impressed. While the court acknowledged that the smell of marijuana is accepted as a basis to believe there is pot inside, it merely gives rise to a belief that it's basic possession of marijuana.
But that wasn't the only argument. There remained their deep concern for the safety from the smell (yes, I'm being facetious calling it "second hand smoke," because it's unclear whether the smell is smoke or fresh pot, and the opinion really has nothing to do with the second-hand smoke aspect in any event).Based on the foregoing, if marijuana possession is the only crime for which the officers in this case had probable cause, the exigency exception for destruction of evidence should not apply because marijuana possession is not a serious crime.
Even the use of cool active verbs ("scurrying"), curious descriptors ("loud movements") and expressions of deep concern reflecting both the terrible, life-and-death dangers of conducting a "knock and talk" to circumvent the Constitution, didn't sway the court. Instead, the court reached the conclusion of remarkably wisdom: An idea so radical, so outlandish, that it never occurred to either the agents or the prosecutors: walk away. While this might make for good fodder to be chiseled into the lintels over courthouses everywhere, the bad news is that the opinion, while persuasive, is not precedential: At the suppression hearing, Agent Stephens argued that he feared for his and the other officers' safety because the home's owner, Ms. Moore, was a known felon, and he suspected Mr. Mongold was a felon as well, based on his "prison tattoos."
Officer safety is not an alternative ground to affirm because the first element of the test is dispositive. The Government presented no evidence that the officers had "reasonable grounds to believe that there [was] immediate need to protect their lives or others." Before entering the home, the officers had not seen a weapon or any other indication of heightened danger. They could most easily have protected the officers' safety by leaving Ms. Moore's home, not by entering it.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value.
This, of course, means that the next time a second-hand smoke case arises, the district judge may not be willing to adopt such a radical concept as expecting the agents to walk away rather than conduct a warrantless search of a home after smelling marijuana or seeing prison tats, because they're very scary to agents.
And don't discount the possibility that if the odor was of burning pot, the agents would be authorized to break down the door to protect themselves from the second hand smoke. Truth is, this opinion doesn't preclude such a holding at all. It could still happen.
Source: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2013/07/13/officer-safety-and-second-hand-smoke.aspx?ref=rss
divorce attorney divorce lawers divorce lawyer divorce lawyers download power of attorney
legal aid eugene oregon legal aid society legal counsel legal help legal information
Ariana Grande’s ‘Problem’ music video has debuted. The pop music diva and her Iggy Azalea, her guest artist, take us on a dazzling trip back to the 1960s, with mini-skirts and psychedelic visuals and Big Sean drops in for a cameo appearance.
The 20-year-old Ariana Grande has made the transition from Nickelodeon star to pop music star with a successful debut album, ‘Yours Truly,’ that debuted at No. 1. But with another album already on the way, she’s not finished dominating the charts, as her new song ‘Problem’ produced by Max Martin has already reached No. 1 on the Billboard Hot 100. Australian rapper, Iggy Azalea, her guest artist has a hit of her own that’s ruling the charts, as ‘Fancy’ hits No. 2 and may yet top ‘Problem.’ Either way, it seems our songs of the summer have two strong contenders already.
The song is infectious and its hook will linger with you, ‘I got one less, one less problem / One less problem without ya’
Now there’s an exciting music video to go along with it that gleefully takes a headlong dive into the 1960s. It’s engaging, and with a literal blizzard of stripes and other visual effects that some may find trippy.
And yes, the pop diva — in the very best sense with her amazing, multi-octave vocal range — Ariana Grande is decked out in a mini-skirt and Go-Go boots that evoke Nancy Sinatra and the iconic song ‘These Boots Are Made For Walkin” Iggy Azalea, who’s been lately a fashion icon, makes a memorable appearance as well, in full fledged ’60s mode.
One might wonder, why that particular decade, why the costumes and the sexy dancing, but as is so often the case with music videos it’s a matter of “why ask why?!” The video has gone viral and you can see it in its entirety below!
Pictures: PR Photos
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RightCelebrity/~3/eOSy110K2rY/
Source: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202637627585?rss=rss_nlj
My sister recently had a talk with my four-year-old nephew Jack about strangers. Here's how it went:
SISTER: Now, Jack, if a stranger says, "Come here, I want to show you something," what do you do?
JACK: I turn around and run!
SISTER: If a stranger says, "Come here, I want to give you some candy," what do you do?
JACK: I turn around and run!
SISTER: If a stranger says, "Come here, I want to show you my puppy," what do you do?
JACK: Oh, I love puppies...
Source: http://www.prettyinthecity.com/blog/2011/7/26/stranger-danger.html
Amanda Marcum Amanda Peet Amanda Righetti Amanda Swisten Amber Arbucci
Ashley Olsen Ashley Scott Ashley Tappin Ashley Tisdale Asia Argento
Source: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/05/27/anti-bush-protesters-lose-free-speech-case/?mod=WSJBlog
real estate attorney real estate lawyer solicitor solicitors statute law
Thirty-three-year-old Barney Miller is an Australian surfer. He’s also a quadriplegic. Red Bull posted a video profiling a day in his life as a way to raise awareness about spinal cord injury research. The clip starts with him brushing his teeth and ends with Barney riding waves with his buddies. So far it’s been watched more than 130,000 times on YouTube, and once you push “play” you’ll understand why.
Daisy Fuentes Dania Ramirez Danica Patrick Daniella Alonso Danneel Harris
Source: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202637032014?rss=rss_nlj
absolute power of attorney attorney attorney at law attorney definition attorney directory
Despite your thoughts on the 1988 Christmas classic Die Hard, you haven't really seen the film until you've seen a pudgy, lovable pug take over Bruce Willis' role as Detective John McClane.
Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2014/05/malawi-president-attempts-to-nullify-election-results.php
discrimination lawyers district attorney divorce atterney divorce attorney divorce lawers
Source: http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2014-05-29/maleficent-premieres-in-hollywood
Danneel Harris Deanna Russo Denise Richards Desiree Dymond Diane Kruger
Source: http://traffic.libsyn.com/ringler/RR_021814_CPT.mp3
probate attorney real estate attorney real estate lawyer solicitor solicitors
Source: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202654681880?rss=rss_nlj
attorney directory attorney fees attorney finder attorney law attorney lawyer
At a closed-door conference, the attorney general made his case for reducing some drug sentences and opening up the clemency process.
lawyer directory lawyer fees lawyer firm lawyer malpractice attorneys lawyer office
Following his DUI arrest yesterday in Miami, the Internet exploded with responses to Justin Bieber's latest headline grabbing antics.
Amanda Marcum Amanda Peet Amanda Righetti Amanda Swisten Amber Arbucci
pro bono lawyers probate attorney real estate attorney real estate lawyer solicitor
When the unit arrived at the Macons' home, two weeks before Merien's arrest, officers had two outstanding warrants for couple's son, Derrick Macon, then 50, including one for child support. Officers insisted they be allowed into the home, William Macon said.
Because the officers did not have a search warrant, William Macon refused, he said.
William Macon, 83 years old, wasn't to be easily pushed. You gotta love tough old birds. And before anyone gets all bent out of shape about his "derelict" deadbeat son, it turns out that while the team knew all about the outstanding warrants for child support, they somehow missed the order holding that he wasn't the father of the child. But let's not have facts impair a good story.
When the deputies saw Merien drive up to the back of the home, they approached with guns drawn — one pointed at her head as she sat in the car — and pressed her about her son's whereabouts, according to the lawsuit.
"I was really surprised when they walked up with their guns," Merien Macon, a retired clerical worker, said last week. "I was scared. I was shocked. I was surprised."
Macon, who had dropped off her son earlier, told them she didn't know where he was and she did not want to answer questions, [Macon's lawyer, Elizabeth] Kaveny said.
And so the deputies, duly chastised by their overly violent conduct frightening a nice old woman, apologized profusely and left her in peace outraged by her refusal to do as they commanded, decided to teach an old woman a lesson.
At that point, Merien Macon became upset and told the officers she would not speak to them. The officers handcuffed, frisked and arrested Merien Macon on a charge of obstruction of justice.
The officers then took her to a nearby parking lot, where they gave her a phone and told her to call her son and find out where he was.
Merien's husband, William, a retired electrician, called that "a hostage situation," attempting to trade off his wife for his son. The sheriff's office claimed that was not at all the case, and they were just being thoughtful.
The sheriff's office denied attempting to pressure Macon to call her son and said she was moved to the parking lot because her husband had become upset and neighbors were starting to gather.
They didn't want to upset old William by forcing him to watch her cuffed, frisked and with guns pointed at his wife's head. A very sensitive gesture in law enforcement, likely to win a medal at some point.
The Macons sued for what was done to Merien.
Merien Macon was charged with felony obstruction of justice, leading her to file a lawsuit against Sheriff Tom Dart and the officers involved. A Cook County jury recently sided with her, awarding Macon $327,500 and agreeing with her husband that what happened that afternoon went too far.
Frankly, that's a very healthy award, give that most plaintiffs in her situation could hope for a fraction of that at best. But then, picture a jury hearing the testimony in this case, looking at the 77-year-old woman and her loving 83-year-old husband, and pondering the cuffs on her wrists, the hands on her body, the gun at her head, all over a mistaken child support warrant. It doesn't get more sympathetic than this.
"I've seen this type of thing over and over and over," William Macon said. "But when it happens to you it becomes more personal."
Truth. Unless you happen to be knowledgeable about your rights, have the guts to assert them with a gun pointed at your head and, purely by happenstance, a couple of cool codgers, chances aren't good you would end up with a verdict of this magnitude. This makes it an exceptionally good reason to both applaud the Macons, and to care a whole lot about when things like this happen "over and over and over." Because next time it could be you, and it will, without question, become "more personal."
H/T Spencer Neal
Source: http://blog.simplejustice.us/2013/07/13/protip-dont-screw-with-old-folks.aspx?ref=rss
private lawyer pro bono lawyers probate attorney real estate attorney real estate lawyer
When the President of the United States calls something “one of the gravest national security dangers that the United States faces,” it seems worthwhile to pay attention. The President’s statement, on February 12, 2014, was not referring to the dangers of war or terrorism, but to the threat of cyber attacks on the nation’s critical infrastructure and U.S. companies. Over the past couple of years, cybersecurity has become an important corporate governance issue, as recent cyber attacks, increased federal oversight, potential legal liability and economic risks have made paying attention certainly worthwhile.
This article was originally published in The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel. To read the full article, please click here.
Source: http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/2014/04/cybersecurity-breaching-the-boardroom/
electronic power of attorney employment attorney employment law employment law courses employment lawyer
Source: http://stupidcelebrities.net/2014/05/tila-tequila-baby-daddy-war/
Serrano sued in a class action claiming sex discrimination and the EEOC intervened. The trial court ruled for the employer on a number of issues; the 6th Circuit reversed. Serrano and EEOC v. Cintas Corp (6th Cir 11/09/2012).
The main issue was whether EEOC could pursue a pattern-or-practice style claim pursuant to § 706 of Title VII.
The employer argued that under § 706 the EEOC is limited to proving its allegations of discrimination pursuant to the McDonnell Douglas Corp v. Green, 411 US 792 (1973), burden-shifting framework, and cannot use the pattern-or-practice framework announced by the Supreme Court in Teamsters v. United States, 431 US 324 (1977). The court rejected that argument. Even though the Teamsters case arose under § 707, the theory of that case can be used under § 706.
The trial court erred in holding that the employer was entitled to judgment on the pleadings in light of the EEOC's failure to plead its intent to rely on the Teamsters framework. Although the EEOC's complaint "is not a model of good lawyering," a plaintiff need not indicate at the pleading stage which circumstantial evidentiary framework it plans to use.
Source: http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2012/11/eeoc_can_use_te.html
find an attorney find attorney find lawyer free attorney consultation free lawyer
business lawyer civil attorney colleges for lawyers colorado disability lawyer commercial law
Source: http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2014-05-29/at-last-a-new-photo-of-north-west-has-been-released
Hilary Duff Hilary Swank Isla Fisher Ivana Bozilovic Ivanka Trump
Source: http://jurist.org/paperchase/2014/05/thai-soldiers-arrest-rights-defender-and-son.php
injury lawyer injury lawyers international law international law schools internet lawyer
Source: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202637008054?rss=rss_nlj
criminal defense attorney criminal defense attorneys criminal defense lawyer criminal injury lawyers criminal justice lawyer
Source: http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2014/05/27/meet-squire-patton-boggs/?mod=WSJBlog
find attorney find lawyer free attorney consultation free lawyer free lawyer advice
Austin Mahone gave a live concert performance on the Today Show, debuting a new song, ‘Shadow.’ See the photos and video of the teen pop sensation celebrating the release of his debut album, ‘The Secret’ with an enormous audience of his fans, the Mahomies.
The 18-year-old Austin Mahone has come a long way from YouTube viral video star to bona fide recording artist. Already hugely popular with his hit singles — in particular “Mmm Yeah” and “What About Love” — now he makes his long awaited major label debut with ‘The Secret.’
The comparison to Justin Bieber is inevitable. As one former YouTube sensation transitioned to worldwide teen pop music sensation only to become embroiled in the legal system and to dominate tabloids another one is on the rise and is the teen idol of the moment.
Prior to his high energy live performance on Monday, Memorial Day on The Plaza at Rockefeller Center in New York City, he answered some questions from fans submitted to him on Instagram as he spent a couple of moments in the Today Show’s famed Orange Room, chatting with Carson Daly.
The Mahomies had begun forming the line to get into the free concert on Sunday morning, more than 24 hours in advance. No doubt being able to Instagram questions gave them something to do!
And in answering one of the questions he revealed the craziest thing a fan had done. He said, “I would say one time this girl hopped in my car while I was driving away from a show. I looked over, and I was like, ‘I’ve never seen you before.” He went on to note that he dropped her off since he couldn’t “just take her home.”
After his performing first “Mmm Yeah” with a troupe of backup dancers, and coming back with his other hit, “What about Love,” Austin Mahone took to the stage and sat on a stool to accompany himself on acoustic guitar as he gave the live television debut performance of his new song, ‘Shadow.’
You can see more pictures along with the replay video of Austin Mahone’s ‘Today Show’ live concert performance below!
Mmm Yeah
What About Love?
Shadow
Interview
Pictures: PR Photos
Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RightCelebrity/~3/J4sa7MHaI4w/